Compact fluorescent bulbs and the LED ( light emitting diode technology) share several illuminating commonalities. However, a recent report by the United State Department of Energy, evaluating the potential energy conservation with the LED threatens the very existence of the compact fluorescent light bulb.

The data and findings indicate that with  widespread use over the next 20-years, the savings would account for  more than $100 billion in energy costs, reducing the need to build two dozen more 24 new large power plants. 

Compact fluorescent bulb compares the differences between an LED and CFL. Here are the facts:

• LEDs tend to be more durable and damage resistant than the compact fluorescent bulb

• Compact fluorescent light bulbs lack the directional light functionality that the LED provides. As LEDs are exceptional for emitting directional light, it tends to offer more flexibility and multiple uses inside and outside of the home:

• Both the LED and CFL suffer from heat sensitivity. Excessive heat is detrimental, ultimately decreasing their life span

• Unlike many CFLs which are not compatible with enclosed light fixtures, the LED has features, which  lighting experts consider to be quite cost-efficient.

• LEDs do not emit the type of heat that a compact fluorescent light bulb does.

• While, frequent shutting on and off shortens the overall lifespan of the CFL, LEDs do not share the same performance issues. In fact, LEDs perform well with constant on and off cycling.

• The technologies for compact fluorescent light bulb and the LEDs are forever being improved

• LEDs performance is diminished by certain light fixtures’ electronics and driver.

For now and fortunately for the CFL, the LED happens to be a costlier replacement cost than the compact fluorescent light bulb.